Skip to main content

Chiles-Whitted Eastern Air Lines sighting

24 July 1948 · Near Montgomery, Alabama

UnresolvedWhat the PURSUE files record: 17 pages in 9 documents from the Department of War, the FBI and the CIA.On the map

Summary

Two Eastern Air Lines pilots, Capt. Clarence S. Chiles and co-pilot John B. Whitted, reported an unidentified object near Montgomery, Alabama, at about 0245 on 24 July 1948. An Air Force check-list gave the location as 20 miles south of Montgomery, one object in sight for 5 to 10 seconds at 5,000 feet. In his statement of 3 August 1948, Chiles wrote that an aircraft with no wings passed to the right, with two rows of lighted windows, flame shooting about fifty feet from the rear and a blue glow underneath. It then pulled up into broken clouds. Whitted's statement put the object at about a hundred feet long and the speed at roughly 700 MPH, which he called a rough estimate.

The Atlanta Journal of 25 July 1948, clipped in an FBI file, reported that the pilots described a wingless craft with a fiery tail. It said passenger C. L. McKelvie told reporters he saw no form of ship, only a continuous light. Major R. A. Llewellyn interviewed McKelvie in Columbus, Ohio. His 31 July 1948 report recorded that McKelvie saw only a streak of flame and heard no sound.

The same newspaper article said the Army Air Forces in Washington and the Weather Bureau at Montgomery both suggested a radar weather balloon. Gen. George C. Kenney and Boeing's president said the craft was not theirs. Project Blue Book Special Report No. 14 listed the sighting as Case V and gave the time as 0340.

Other records placed the event in wider context. A 1948 Air Intelligence study noted that the pilots' drawings closely resembled an object reported at Arnhem, Netherlands, on 20 July 1948. An Australian chronology said the near-collision prompted ATIC to write an Estimate of the Situation. A San Antonio FBI memo of 31 January 1949 described the report as an unconventional aircraft and said little concrete information had been obtained on such phenomena.

Written by AI from the pages linked below. It can be wrong; the linked originals are the record.

Where the files disagree

Two documents give different accounts of the same detail. Both are quoted as written; we don't say which is right.

What the files say

  1. UFO incident summaries 101-172, Box index

    Department of War · released 2026-05-08 · 3 pages on this case

    “It was clear there were no wings present, that it was powered by some jet or other type of power shooting flame from the rear some fifty feet.”

    Page 118 →

    “He saw no physical shape - only a streak of flame moving in a straight line.”

    Page 117 →
  2. FBI UFO case file section 4: flying disc records (1947-1968)

    FBI · released 2026-05-08 · 3 pages on this case

    “But," added Mr. McK., "I'm not very well versed in aeronautics, and certainly I wasn't looking for any Buck Rogers space ship.”

    Page 180 →

    “No sound or air disturbance was noted in connection with this appearance.”

    Page 115 →
  3. Air Force analysis of US flying object reports, pages 101-172

    Department of War · released 2026-06-12 · 4 pages on this case

    “The object was cigar shaped and seemed to be about a hundred feet in length.”

    Page 134 →

Explanations in the record

What the documents themselves say the event was, as recorded. Not our assessment.

Related