Daily UAP/UFO news · gov drops · sightings · witness accounts
niche or mildly interesting
UAP Insight significance score
UAP Characteristics
Evidence Types
Government Programs Referenced
Official Conclusion
Benign; no mission impact; not assessed as a lasing event; UAP under no intelligent control.
Official Description
This document is a Mission Report (MISREP), a standardized reporting form the U.S. Military uses to record the circumstances surrounding its operations. U.S. military services often use MISREPs to report Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP) to AARO. The GENTEXT, or “general text” section of these reports often contains important qualitative, contextual information, distinguishing it from the more quantitative, or numerical, data found elsewhere in the report. A U.S. military operator reported observing a “misshapen and uneven ball of white light,” describing multiple “glares or light” emanating from an “unknown origin.” The reporter described the UAP as a “light/glare halo effect” at the top of the Full-Motion Video (FMV) feed. All descriptive and estimative language contained in this report reflects the reporter’s subjective interpretation at the time of the event. Such characterizations should not be interpreted as a conclusive indication of the presence or absence of any intrinsic object features or performance characteristics.
Key Findings
This is a USCENTCOM Mission Report (MISREP) filed by an AFSOC ISR asset (12 SOS/27 SOW) operating under Operation INHERENT RESOLVE in Syria on 20-21 October 2024. The report documents a 20+ hour ISR/FMV/SIGINT mission that included a UAP incident observed at 1559Z on 20 October 2024, described as a misshapen and uneven ball of white light and light/glare effects crossing the FMV camera feed from unknown origin. The aircrew assessed the UAP as benign with no mission impact.
Analyst Notes
The UAP observation consisted solely of light/glare effects on an FMV camera feed with no corroborating sensor data (no radar, no RWR returns, no interrogation conducted). The aircrew themselves assessed the event as benign and explicitly ruled out a lasing event but offered no further explanation. All kinematic data (altitude, velocity, trajectory) are listed as unknown or not measured. The observer was a single E-4 rank airman. The physical state designation of 'Plasma' appears to be a form-field categorization rather than a scientific determination. The phenomenon may plausibly be lens flare, sensor artifact, or atmospheric optical effect given its appearance exclusively on the FMV feed.
Extracted Entities
People
Agencies & Organizations
Locations
PDF not loading? Open directly ↗
AI analysis by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 20, 2026
Aircraft & Objects
Dates