Daily UAP/UFO news · gov drops · sightings · witness accounts
solid newsworthy item
UAP Insight significance score
UAP Characteristics
Evidence Types
Government Programs Referenced
Official Conclusion
Assessed as benign; no advanced capabilities or materials observed; path appeared predetermined; UAP not reobserved after engagement.
Official Description
This document is a Mission Report (MISREP), a standardized reporting form the U.S. Military uses to record the circumstances surrounding its operations. U.S. military services often use MISREPs to report Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP) to AARO. The GENTEXT, or “general text” section of these reports often contains important qualitative, contextual information, distinguishing it from the more quantitative, or numerical, data found elsewhere in the report. While conducting a weapons calibration test, U.S. military operators reported observing a lens flare via MX-20 and MX-25 IR sensors after firing an AGM-176 Griffin air-to-surface missile. The operators described the source of the flare as a UAP moving through the aircraft’s sensor’s field-of-view at a high rate of speed. The reporter assessed that the flare was associated with “a significant heat source.” All descriptive and estimative language contained in this report reflects the reporter’s subjective interpretation at the time of the event. Such characterizations should not be interpreted as a conclusive indication of the presence or absence of any intrinsic object features or performance characteristics.
Key Findings
A SECRET-classified Mission Report (MISREP) from USCENTCOM/AFSOC documenting a UAP incident that occurred on 20 September 2024 during an armed overwatch mission over Ayn Al Asad Airbase, Iraq. After releasing an AGM-176 Griffin missile, the crew's Weapons Systems Officer (WSO) and Combat Systems Officer (CSO) observed an unidentified object fly through the aircraft's MX-20 and MX-25 IR sensors at high speed, producing an IR lens flare indicative of a significant heat source. The UAP was assessed as benign, no engagement occurred, and the object was not reobserved after the munition impacted its target.
Analyst Notes
The official document description explicitly notes that the IR lens flare could be an artifact of the sensor system rather than proof of an intrinsic object; all descriptive language is the reporter's subjective interpretation. No radar interrogation of the UAP was conducted. The UAP was observed only briefly during the munition engagement sequence, and the aircraft did not reobserve it. A mundane alternative — that the heat source was associated with the AGM-176 Griffin missile's own exhaust or another ordnance artifact — is not explicitly ruled out in the document. Aircraft type, callsign, and key kinetic data (altitude, velocity, trajectory of UAP) are redacted or left blank.
Extracted Entities
People
Agencies & Organizations
PDF not loading? Open directly ↗
AI analysis by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 20, 2026
Locations
Aircraft & Objects
Dates