Daily UAP/UFO news · gov drops · sightings · witness accounts
A Metabunk post geolocates and analyzes a December 2022 UAP video from Baghdad, Iraq, noting discrepancies with satellite imagery from September 2025.
Key claims
Alternative explanation
Discrepancies between video date and satellite imagery suggest the video may be older or mislabeled.
Summary generated by AI · may contain errors
A Reddit user claims press coverage of the September 2023 PURSUE case mischaracterized the witness and object details from the original FBI 302 document.
A Metabunk analyst applies geolocation and satellite imagery analysis to an INDOPACOM 2024 UAP report, suggesting the sighting may be explainable by offshore wind farm infrastructure.
Astrophysicist Adam Frank critiques the U.S. government's UAP file releases as lacking sufficient evidence, describing the videos as poor-quality imagery that fails the standard for extraordinary claims.
A Metabunk analysis examines INDOPACOM 2024 footage of an irregular balloon-shaped object with radial projections, suggesting mundane explanations for the reported UAP sighting.
A Metabunk analysis of a 2020 Department of Defense infrared video from the Middle East showing a five-second UAP clip submitted to AARO; the analysis suggests the video quality is poor and insufficient for definitive conclusions.
The Department of War (formerly DoD) has released the first tranche of UAP-related videos and documents to a public repository, including historical documents, recent pilot reports, and new video evidence.
A Metabunk analyst applies geolocation and satellite imagery analysis to an INDOPACOM 2024 UAP report, suggesting the sighting may be explainable by offshore wind farm infrastructure.
A Metabunk analysis examines INDOPACOM 2024 footage of an irregular balloon-shaped object with radial projections, suggesting mundane explanations for the reported UAP sighting.
A Metabunk analysis of a 2020 Department of Defense infrared video from the Middle East showing a five-second UAP clip submitted to AARO; the analysis suggests the video quality is poor and insufficient for definitive conclusions.